Art and Faith

Thursday, 18 September 2008

The 12th Century New Roman Mosaics of the Cathedral of the Nativity of the Most Holy Mother of God in Monreale in Sicily

The interior of the New Roman Cathedral of the Nativity of the Mother of God in Monreale (Sicily) ITALY

_______________________________

These are mosaics from the Cathedral of the Nativity of the Most Holy Mother of God in Monreale, a suburb of Palermo in Sicily. It was begun in the reign of King Guillaume II the Good, and was built between 1174 and 1267. It contains some of the finest extant New Roman mosaics. New Roman, of course, is the correct usage for what is mislabelled “Byzantine” in Catholic and Catholic-influenced sources. Why did this distortion arise in the West? No doubt, it was to mask the continuity between the Classical Roman state and the Christian Empire of New Rome. If we refuse to use this Western artifice, we see the obvious links between Old and New Rome, and between New Rome and Moscow. The doctrine of the “Third Rome” not only becomes understandable, it becomes imperative and necessary.

Old Rome fell to the axes of the barbarians. New Rome fell to the infidel Turk. Moscow is the Third Rome, and a fourth there never shall be”. This becomes clear only when we discard the construct known as “Byzantine”. We Russians bow to New Rome, and acknowledge our debt to her. In doing so, we also bow to Classical Rome, the mother of New Rome. Thusly, Classical Rome was the mother of Christian New Rome. Christian New Rome was the mother of Christian Moscow. We, the heirs of Christian Moscow, have the fullness of apostolicity through our direct connection with New Rome, which gives us an ultimate connection with Orthodox Old Rome, which leads to the final connection with Jerusalem and the Upper Room.

Therefore, as these mosaics illustrate, a connection with New Rome obviates any necessary submission to the Pope of Rome and Patriarch of the West. That is to say, His Holiness Aleksei and His Holiness Benedict are absolute equals. When the Catholics understand this, there can be talk of union. That, I must say, is far down the road. The best that can be done is good neighbourly relations and cooperation in works of good will. I fear that the Pope of Rome shall never give up his pretensions to universal jurisdiction and infallibility. Until he does so, the most that can exist between Catholic and Orthodox is friendship and fellowship in good deeds. That, however, is no small thing, and must be pursued. At the same time, the opium dreams of ecumaniacs must be opposed, for that shall only lead to disillusion and disappointment. Let us grasp for what is feasible. It’s the only sane course.

******

The Creation of the Cosmos

******

The Creation of the Birds and Fishes

******

The Creation of Adam

******

The Creation of Eve

******

The Meeting of Adam and Eve

******

God Rests After Creation

******

The Fall of Mankind

******

Adam and Eve are Expelled from the Garden

******

Cain and Abel Offer Sacrifice unto God

******

Cain Murders Abel

******

Noe Builds the Ark

******

The Temptation of Christ

******

Christ Heals the Man with a Paralysed Hand

******

Christ Crowns King Guillaume II the Good of Sicily

******

King Guillaume II the Good of Sicily Presents the Cathedral of Monreale to the Mother of God as His Offering to Her

******

Christ Pantocrator

******

Sunday, 13 July 2008

Mikhail Nesterov. Étude for “A Wounded Soldier”. 1915

Étude for “A Wounded Soldier”

Mikhail Nesterov

1915

______________________________

This is a soldier of the tsarist army, wounded in World War I. I find this picture to be a wonderful allegory of our Church in America at present. It’s wounded, it’s weakened; oddly enough, by those claiming to be friends. However, one can see that the soldier isn’t despairing; he hasn’t lost hope. Neither have we. People such as Alexander Schmemann thrust a bayonet into our vitals; yet, we still live on, and we’re ready to fight again. In fact, there’s a deepening cleavage between we “ethnic” Orthodox and some recent converts (one need only look at the writings of Joseph Honeycutt and Frederica Matthewes-Greene to see the difference). We wish to “go home”, whereas they wish to “play at Church” and try to use the Church as a laboratory for their notional ideas. That sounds much like the Catholic lefties of the 60s (no mistake, for Schmemann was friendly with radical Catholics). We’re wounded, yes, but we wish to rejoin our proper regiment and fight under our traditional banners. As for those who wish to do otherwise, I say, “Go, go in peace, and don’t bother the Church. The rest of us are going home where we belong”.

BMD

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 169 other followers